Supreme Court Rules Against Meta in Cambridge Analytica Securities Fraud Appeal

Concept of Supreme Court Interior Where Meta Securities Fraud Appeal Was Dismissed

The Supreme Court's dismissal of Meta's appeal marks a pivotal moment in corporate accountability for data privacy disclosures, potentially reshaping how tech companies communicate risks to investors. This ruling empowers shareholders to pursue their case against Meta for allegedly downplaying privacy risks during the Cambridge Analytica scandal, setting a precedent for future securities fraud litigation in the tech sector.

by
November 22, 2024

The Supreme Court has dismissed Meta Platform’s appeal in a major securities fraud lawsuit related to the Cambridge Analytica scandal, allowing shareholders to proceed with their case.

Case Background

Original Filing

  • Shareholders filed a class action lawsuit for investors who purchased stock between 2016-2018
  • The case centers on Facebook’s 2016 securities filing regarding data privacy risks
  • Meta (then Facebook) allegedly misled investors about privacy risks and data protection measures

Cambridge Analytica Incident

  • Over 30 million users’ private information was obtained by Cambridge Analytica
  • The scandal resulted in a $5 billion FTC civil penalty
  • Facebook paid $725 million in a separate class-action settlement with users

Legal Proceedings

Supreme Court Decision

  • The Court dismissed the appeal as “improvidently granted”
  • This dismissal allows the original lawsuit to proceed in lower courts
  • The Biden administration supported the shareholders’ position

Shareholder Claims

  • Investors argue Facebook misrepresented data security risks in SEC filings
  • The company described potential data breaches as hypothetical despite knowing of actual incidents
  • The 9th Circuit Court previously ruled that shareholders adequately alleged misleading disclosures

Financial Impact

Market Consequences

  • The scandal significantly impacted Meta’s stock value
  • Shareholders claim substantial financial losses from the stock price drop
  • The case involves one of the largest FTC penalties ever imposed on a technology company

Future Implications

Corporate Accountability

  • The case may set precedents for how companies disclose privacy risks
  • It could affect how businesses handle data security disclosures in SEC filings
  • The ruling may influence future securities fraud cases involving tech companies

Also See

The Big Bite: Blackstone’s $8 Billion Jersey Mike’s Subs Acquisition

Fake Meat, Real Money: Claim Your Share of $7.5M Beyond Meat Settlement!

Juul’s $300M Bombshell: Class Action Claimants Stunned as Settlement Checks Ignite Social Media Frenzy

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail