TD Bank’s $1.3B Bombshell: Inside the Largest FinCEN Bank Penalty Ever

TD Bank's $1.3 Billion FinCEN Penalty Explosion

FinCEN's unprecedented $1.3 billion penalty against TD Bank reveals significant gaps in anti-money laundering compliance, sending a clear message to the financial sector. This case underscores the intricacies of regulatory adherence and the substantial risks banks face when falling short of compliance standards. In response, financial institutions are now compelled to thoroughly evaluate and enhance their compliance frameworks to align with evolving regulations and safeguard the financial system's integrity.

by
October 11, 2024

The Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)’s historic $1.3 billion penalty against TD Bank for willful and egregious violations of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) sent shockwaves through the financial industry.

As the largest penalty ever imposed on a depository institution by FinCEN, and part of a larger $3 billion settlement that includes actions from the OCC and Federal Reserve, it highlights the severe consequences of failing to maintain an effective anti-money laundering (AML) program.

This guide breaks down everything you need to know about the landmark enforcement action, the BSA violations involved, and key takeaways for financial institutions. Learn about the BSA’s requirements, how TD Bank’s misconduct harmed the U.S. financial system, and what it takes to avoid similar regulatory consequences.

1. Understand the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and Its Requirements

    • AML Program: Banks must implement a risk-based AML program with internal controls, independent testing, a designated BSA compliance officer, ongoing training, and customer due diligence measures.
    • Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs): Banks must identify and report transactions involving $5,000 or more that appear suspicious or involve potential illegal activity or have no apparent lawful purpose.
    • Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs): Banks must report cash transactions over $10,000, providing key details like the identity of those conducting the transaction.
    • Customer Due Diligence (CDD): Banks must collect and verify customer information, understand the nature and purpose of accounts, develop risk profiles, and conduct ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious activity.
    • Record Retention: Banks must retain records of transactions and customer identifying information for at least five years, including SARs for five years from the date of filing.

Why the BSA Matters:

    • The BSA’s record-keeping and reporting requirements are critical to preventing criminals from using the U.S. financial system to conceal or launder illicit proceeds.
    • SARs and CTRs provide valuable intelligence to law enforcement and regulatory agencies to combat financial crimes, terrorist financing, drug trafficking and other illegal activities.
    • Implementing a strong, risk-based AML program is essential for banks to detect, deter and report suspicious activity.
    • Failure to comply with BSA obligations can enable criminals to exploit vulnerabilities in the financial system and harm the public.

Key Takeaways:

    • The BSA establishes critical recordkeeping and reporting requirements for banks to combat money laundering and financial crimes.
    • Having a robust AML compliance program, timely SAR and CTR filing, and effective CDD processes are cornerstones of BSA compliance.
    • BSA violations can enable bad actors to exploit the financial system for illegal purposes, undermining its integrity and security.
    • Banks that treat BSA/AML compliance as a “check-the-box” exercise do so at their peril – consequences for violations can be severe.

2. TD Bank’s “Willful Failure” and Resulting Harm

    • Inadequate AML Program: TD Bank failed to dedicate sufficient resources to its AML program, understaffed key compliance roles, and maintained critical transaction monitoring gaps.
    • Deficient Monitoring: Failures in transaction monitoring allowed trillions of dollars to flow through the Bank annually without appropriate review, enabling funnel account activity and money laundering.
    • SAR Violations: TD Bank failed to timely file thousands of SARs on $1.5 billion worth of suspicious transactions, including for known money laundering schemes.
    • CTR Inaccuracies: The Bank filed inaccurate CTRs and failed to include critical information about key suspects in major money laundering cases like Da Ying Sze, which misled investigators.
    • CDD Shortcomings: TD Bank failed to collect and verify adequate customer information, allowing high-risk customers to exploit accounts for illicit purposes.

Fallout from TD Bank’s Failures:

    • TD Bank’s AML deficiencies provided a gateway for criminals to launder illicit proceeds from drug trafficking, fraud, and other crimes through the U.S. financial system.
    • Delayed and inaccurate reporting deprived law enforcement of critical intelligence needed to disrupt money laundering and terrorist financing schemes in a timely manner.
    • The Bank put profits over compliance and failed to heed clear red flags, enabling perpetuation of criminal activity and related public harm.
    • Systemic breakdowns spanning over a decade undermined the integrity of the national AML regime that banks play a key role in upholding and enforcing.

Why “Willfulness” Matters:

    • Under the BSA, violations committed “willfully” — with reckless disregard or deliberate blindness, not just intentional misconduct — are subject to heightened penalties.
    • TD Bank’s failure to address known AML deficiencies and treat clear risk signs as “red flags” demonstrated willfulness meriting FinCEN’s stringent enforcement response.
    • Willful violations under the BSA imply reckless disregard or deliberate indifference to compliance obligations, not just intentional misconduct. These reflect especially negatively on a bank’s culture of compliance and management’s commitment to legal and ethical obligations.
    • The “broken windows” theory holds that banks that tolerate AML failures, even if not deliberate, cultivate an environment where more severe misconduct can flourish.

3. Inside FinCEN’s Landmark Enforcement Action

    • Unprecedented Penalty: The $1.3 billion fine is the largest FinCEN has ever imposed on a depository institution and involved parallel actions by the OCC and Federal Reserve, reflecting the gravity of TD Bank’s misconduct.
    • Required Admissions: TD Bank had to admit to years of BSA violations and the resulting harm, a notable departure from some past settlements where banks could neither admit nor deny wrongdoing.
    • Independent Monitorship: A 4-year independent monitor will oversee TD Bank’s remediation efforts and issue periodic reports on the Bank’s BSA/AML compliance, with potential term extensions for insufficient progress.
    • SAR and CDD Lookbacks: TD Bank must engage outside consultants to review past transactions and accounts to identify and file SARs on any previously unreported suspicious activity.
    • Accountability Reviews: The Bank’s internal investigation of employee involvement in BSA violations will be subject to independent assessments and recommendations.

Implications for the Industry:

    • FinCEN is leveraging its enforcement authority strategically to maximize impact, targeting institutions whose misconduct causes significant harm, while maintaining oversight of all financial institutions to ensure BSA/AML compliance. Requiring admissions of wrongdoing and multi-year monitorships signal that FinCEN expects banks to fully remediate BSA/AML deficiencies, not just pay fines.
    • Conducting lookbacks to identify and report previously unreported suspicious activity will be costly for TD Bank but critical to making up for past compliance failures.
    • Evaluating employee conduct and accountability will help assess and strengthen TD Bank’s culture of compliance, a growing regulatory focus across the industry.

Key Lessons for Banks:

    • Implement a risk-based AML program commensurate with your institution’s risk profile, customer base, products/services, and geographic footprint.
    • Devote sufficient human and technological resources to BSA/AML compliance – automation is key but so is staff expertise and capacity.
    • Ensure systems adequately monitor all types of transactions and that alerts are promptly investigated and reported as appropriate.
    • Collect sufficient customer due diligence information, develop risk profiles, and use insights to detect unusual activity.
    • Foster a culture of compliance where BSA/AML is prioritized, “red flags” aren’t ignored, and misconduct isn’t tolerated.

Summary

Bank vault exploding with dollar bills scattering

FinCEN’s landmark $1.3 billion penalty against TD Bank reflects the potential staggering consequences of BSA/AML failures. Banks of all sizes should heed this regulatory wake-up call.

FinCEN’s enforcement action against TD Bank for long-running, widespread violations of the BSA was unprecedented in its scale and scope. The $1.3 billion penalty, admissions of wrongdoing, and rigorous remediation requirements send a resounding industry-wide message: Neglect anti-money laundering obligations at your own peril.

TD Bank’s willful, long-term failure to maintain an adequate AML program and systemic filing deficiencies enabled criminals to exploit the U.S. financial system for years, making this case a clear warning to financial institutions about the dangers of compliance neglect. The staggering resulting penalty underscores FinCEN’s commitment to hold banks accountable for BSA compliance failures that undermine efforts to combat illicit finance.

All institutions should re-evaluate their BSA/AML compliance in light of this historic action and shore up any vulnerabilities before they mushroom into systemic issues. View every “red flag” as regulator bait and take prompt, effective action to mitigate any potential risks or misconduct. A culture of compliance is key.

Test Your Knowledge of FinCEN’s TD Bank Enforcement Action

Questions:

  1. What U.S. anti-money laundering law did TD Bank violate, leading to FinCEN’s enforcement action?
    • A) Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)
    • B) PATRIOT Act
    • C) Money Laundering Control Act
    • D) Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA)
  2. How much was the civil money penalty FinCEN imposed on TD Bank?
    • A) $500 million
    • B) $1.3 billion
    • C) $2.1 billion
    • D) $3.5 billion
  3. Which of the following BSA requirements did TD Bank violate?
    • A) Maintaining an effective AML program
    • B) Filing Suspicious Activity Reports (SARs)
    • C) Filing accurate Currency Transaction Reports (CTRs)
    • D) All of the above
  4. Which government agencies brought parallel enforcement actions alongside FinCEN?
    • A) Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)
    • B) Federal Reserve
    • C) Both A and B
    • D) None of the above
  5. How long is the independent monitorship imposed on TD Bank?
    • A) 2 years
    • B) 3 years
    • C) 4 years
    • D) 5 years

Answers:

  1. A) The Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) is the primary U.S. AML law that TD Bank violated, resulting in FinCEN’s enforcement action.
  2. B) FinCEN imposed a massive $1.3 billion civil money penalty on TD Bank, the largest ever imposed on a depository institution by the agency.
  3. D) TD Bank failed to maintain an adequate AML program, file timely SARs, and file accurate CTRs as required by the BSA.
  4. C) The OCC and Federal Reserve brought parallel enforcement actions against TD Bank alongside FinCEN.
  5. C) TD Bank must engage an independent monitor for a 4-year term to oversee remediation efforts and BSA/AML compliance.

Key Takeaways

    • FinCEN’s record-breaking enforcement action against TD Bank demonstrates its commitment to combat financial crimes and protect the U.S. financial system.
    • TD Bank’s BSA violations were severe, long-running, and widespread, enabling criminals to exploit the Bank to launder illicit proceeds for years.
    • The landmark $1.3 billion penalty reflects the immense harm to the public and financial system integrity resulting from TD Bank’s failures.
    • All financial institutions should assess their BSA/AML compliance in light of this action and proactively remediate any known deficiencies or risk similar consequences.
    • Fostering a genuine culture of compliance, with sufficient human and technological resources devoted to BSA/AML, is critical to mitigating risks.

Need Legal Help?

If you need legal assistance, in any field of law, our free concierge service can connect you with experienced attorneys in any practice area and state. Contact us to learn more.

Also See

Robocall Reckoning: Citibank’s $29.5M TCPA Settlement Unveiled

The $6,200 College Conspiracy: How Top Schools Allegedly Colluded to Inflate Tuition

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail